emission icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
emission copied to clipboard

different rails are showing the exact same contnet

Open katarinabatina opened this issue 7 years ago • 12 comments

image

image

image

katarinabatina avatar May 08 '17 15:05 katarinabatina

I can't repro this, but it seems like it would be a metaphysics bug.

sarahscott avatar May 11 '17 12:05 sarahscott

Is it happening on production or staging?

sarahscott avatar May 11 '17 12:05 sarahscott

production

katarinabatina avatar May 11 '17 12:05 katarinabatina

Is it in fact a bug? Maybe I'm overlooking something, but I just see a single work in the 3 rails. That's something that could happen and a bit hard to fix, but seeing as that's an edge case I don't think we need to change that now.

I seem to recall that the more surprising issue was that once you selected 'view all' you saw different works, is that correct?

alloy avatar May 11 '17 17:05 alloy

Yes that's correct Eloy

Sent from my iPhone

On May 11, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Eloy Durán [email protected] wrote:

Is it in fact a bug? Maybe I'm overlooking something, but I just see a single work in the 3 rails. That's something that could happen and a bit hard to fix, but seeing as that's an edge case I don't think we need to change that now.

I seem to recall that the more surprising issue was that once you selected 'view all' you saw different works, is that correct?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

katarinabatina avatar May 11 '17 17:05 katarinabatina

Oh I remember now, we fetch 60 artworks and pick 20 random ones from that set, which is why the results look different when you view them all.

alloy avatar May 11 '17 18:05 alloy

Is this something we need to look into in metaphysics?

sarahscott avatar May 12 '17 07:05 sarahscott

My conclusion is that this works as intended at the time. @katarinabatina would you like to revisit that randomisation?

alloy avatar May 12 '17 10:05 alloy

We probably should but not prior to release

Sent from my iPhone

On May 12, 2017, at 6:57 AM, Eloy Durán [email protected] wrote:

My conclusion is that this works as intended at the time. @katarinabatina would you like to revisit that randomisation?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

katarinabatina avatar May 12 '17 11:05 katarinabatina

@katarinabatina is this still a problem?

sarahscott avatar Aug 11 '17 14:08 sarahscott

It’s definitely still a thing that can happen, but it’s actually a MP issue, not an Emission one, so it should probably be moved there. We’ll still probably not work on it any time soon, though.

alloy avatar Aug 11 '17 15:08 alloy

(@sarahscott you can use ZenHub to move a ticket to a different repo.)

alloy avatar Aug 11 '17 15:08 alloy