Arno Gourdol

Have you tried using `mf.$text('json')`?

The intent of MathJSON/MASTON is to produce a structure that is both stable (i.e. independent of the rendering) and easy to parse, which seems to be your use case. I...

OK, I get it. Fair point about the possible ambiguity of parsing in some cases. (Although this ambiguity could be resolved with a semantic pass on the MathJSON ouput, i.e....

I'm going to think about this some more. This is not as easy as it sounds :) By the time the output is requested, the original input is long gone...

These functions are commented out because they need to be rewritten to work with the new selection model. Getting selection in matrix to work (again) is leftover work from the...

not yet, still on my todo list

Yes, still on the to-do list...

Thanks for reporting this and for taking the time to write an excellent report and to build a reproducible case. Your fix can work, but I don't think it's quite...

@Temez1 I'm not sure the issue you're describing is the same as the original issue. The original issue is specifically an issue when remounting a component and the previously inferred...

Alternatively, the math-field component should respect the `user-select: none` property, since that seems the reasonable and intuitive thing to do.