Alexandre Rocha Lima e Marcondes
Alexandre Rocha Lima e Marcondes
take a look on PR #13, please.
@guivinicius rola compartilhar comigo também esse modelo?
That happens for name too: ``` Process: love [36239] Path: /Users/USER/Downloads/*/LIKO-12.app/Contents/MacOS/love Identifier: me.ramilego4game.liko12 Version: 11.1 (???) Code Type: X86-64 (Native) Parent Process: ??? [1] Responsible: love [36239] User ID: 501...
OK. It makes sense and this is the main reason why I cam creating the [WinApi](http://github.com/arlm/WinApi) project. Take a look on what I have done with the [WM_GETTEXT](http://github.com/arlm/WinApi/blob/master/src/WinApi.User32/WindowMessage%2BSend.cs) message from...
You are welcome. There are some generic tasks also: - [ ] Change all `ref` and `out` parameters to pointers - [ ] Change all `StringBuffer` parameters to `char*` pointers...
@NN--- No, the library generates automatically other options for consuming the API without pointers with the use of the `[Friendly]` attribute during the library codification, which we do on all...
A little more quotes, for reference: from @AArnott [here](https://github.com/AArnott/pinvoke/pull/268#discussion_r74444091): > You seem to have done a careful job at making this type interact well with `ACCESS_MASK`. But I'm curious why...
@vbfox, if you don't mind, could you explain a little more the problem you see on the Overlapped solution with Async APIs and, if you do have have an opinion...
Ohh that sounds great!
Please, do the fix on a branch of yours and do a pull request or post a diff.