Ari Chivukula

There's a [proposed extension to the existing origin trial to add shared workers](https://arichiv.github.io/saa-non-cookie-storage/shared-workers.html). It might be in Chrome M123.

Shared Workers were added to the SAA extension in Chrome 123! This will be a part of the existing origin trial: https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/blog/saa-non-cookie-storage

It's important to note that in the proposed API localStorage or sessionStorage would have to be requested to be included. They are offered, but one could just request access to...

Two additional explainers (each of which is an extension to [Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage](https://privacycg.github.io/saa-non-cookie-storage/)) have been published! [Explainer: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to omit unpartitioned cookies](https://privacycg.github.io/saa-non-cookie-storage/omit-unpartitioned-cookies.html)...

@johannhof @cfredric @sbingler @DCtheTall @bvandersloot

> When we discussed [privacycg/storage-access#171](https://github.com/privacycg/storage-access/issues/171) I think I assumed 5. > > It seems a bit weird if `cookieEnabled` returns false when partitioned cookies work. Just to be sure @annevk,...

It seems we all basically agree on what the spec currently says, but given Safari seems to align while Chrome and Firefox differ, do any of us feel the spec...

I have metrics in chrome M125 to measure usage of cookieEnabled in third-party contexts. Once I have some data from that I'll write up a proposal to align Chrome with...

Makes sense to me, I can propose this and try to get it in M114.

@johannhof for review of the content, especially https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/33391