Alexander Richardson

> But regardless, this belongs in a common C file or header that jdw57_memcpy can share with it, as well as to keep bcopy.c as untainted as possible. I think...

> I don't like this, and view it as a feature not a bug that we ditched all the bogus debugging crud from jdw57_memcpy.c (both the abort and the warning...

> So any word either on the patches I pointed people at (to use a modified installer) or the dtrace script I posted (less info, but maybe enough, but no...

@bsdimp I've just hit the panic while rsync'ing lots of files over to the board, here's the output from you patch: ``` WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0):...

Should we also cherry-pick https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/commit/6c8ab086fed37a6b44fa84377e48c499f223ae80 or just wait until the next upstream merge?

I don't think allowing tags on shm_open pages is a good idea since a capability written to the shared memory segment might not be mapped to the same underlying data...

Can we just use %lp or is that not supported? If not this seems fine to me.

Upstream review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34971

I set up the CheriBSD Jenkins to always use `-s` and I find that even for build races you generally get enough information to guess what went wrong. If disk...

Bmake has now been updated to include my patch, should we merge this to make the build output more useful?