Ari Becker

> AFAIK, provider{} blocks do not configure anything remotely. They just enable TF to access the provider's API, no? The implementation for this may simply be to, whenever attempting to...

@brandonc I'm not sure why this is closed as completed, rather than waiting on API support, but I wanted to put in my 2c about why I think this is...

@dankochetov Hmmm, I'm looking at the custom types and I have the following concerns / questions: 1. The `config` field in the type parameter for `customType` is only available as...

> @Vashiru I'm not involved in this, so I don't have the context myself to drive the discussion. > > One concern I remember being raised is the length of...

@maxgoedjen > * The hash is the canonical unique identifier for the secret. Other fields (particularly names) do not have uniqueness constraints, so it's entirely possible and valid to have...

@anthonyshew is it? I tried `turbo.jsonc` with `1.12.3` and I get an error `Could not find turbo.json`.

@mehulkar it's not even my issue originally, I just watched it for updates since I'm affected by it too 😅 Please note that editors (e.g. WebStorm) can and do identify...

Got it. The following seems (at first glance) to work: ```typescript { attributes: { ratingNumStars: { type: CustomAttributeType('number'), default: 0 } } } ``` although, for what it's worth, putting...

> @ari-becker checking in, we're you able to resolve your typing issue? Hey, this came up in a side project of mine, no further progress beyond my last comment 🙂

> Ah, you need the overlay installed, which isn't exposed outside of the flake. I'll try and make this possible, or avoid requiring an overlay. Hey, I just ran into...