e_arel
e_arel
I will take care of this this week.
> To fix the merge conflicts, I removed the "inverse of" axioms from ro-module.owl for RO_0002234 / `has output` and RO_0002352/ `input of`, since they are already moved to the...
I don't think so
Is there update on the state of this issue?
For reference this is an example of the current state of the ontology, power generating unit: 
I think the input/output perspective is tangential. The `power` of a transformation unit is associated to its performance in a specific function. We have the `has function` axioms, it would...
Could we have something like: 
Example CHP 
I think that this can be ugly because it would imply a relation between a `specifically dependent continuant` and a `generically dependent continuant`
Alternative without weird relation, make every subclass of power capacity have to be associated with an object with a function:  This is less "generic" but easier to implement as...