Should sdkStack and/or sdkVersion be configurable by end users?

[blaine-arcjet]

These are internal details that help us or end-users with debugging, so I don't think these should be able to be changed via options. If that's our decision, we'll probably need to duplicate some code between arcjet and @arcjet/next for creating the RemoteClient since we won't be able to pass the SDK information as options.

[davidmytton]

Agreed. They're for our usage only and shouldn't be configurable by end users.

[blaine-arcjet]

We need to remove createRemoteClient from the arcjet package since you can't export two functions with the same name. It probably needs to exist in the @arcjet/protocol package. We can then rename createNextRemoteClient (and the others in each adapter) to createRemoteClient and accept a different options object.