archinstall
archinstall copied to clipboard
hyprland updates
Those are just my thoughts for best experience.
- Thunar is better than having to drag KDE dependencies
- hyprpolkitagent is more tailored for Hyprland
- Rofi-hyprland is way better than the limited wofi
Is Rofi-hyprland preferred for most Hyprland users? Arch users tend to want minimalistic stuff rather than full featured applications most of the time.
I don't use hyprland myself, so this is mostly a control question to ask the general community :)
Is
Rofi-hyprlandpreferred for most Hyprland users? Arch users tend to want minimalistic stuff rather than full featured applications most of the time.I don't use hyprland myself, so this is mostly a control question to ask the general community :)
I don't use it either to be honest, but as a Distro maintainer part of my job is to ask around what is preferred over what, so I can confidently answer this by saying yes wofi is extremely limited from what I have been told. Looks great but limited that's why they prefer rofi
I vote yes for this. I think Dolphin and it's dependencies are terrible idea in a minimalist environments like Hyprland or any WM in general. Rofi is also way better choice because it's more widely used than Wofi.
Sorry my bad need to clarify that rofi package is rofi-wayland not rofi-hyprland typo...