Archie L. Cobbs

Hi David, OK thanks for the explanation - that makes sense. Not sure if what you've explained is properly documented though... you may want to consider adding a note to...

Hi David, > The reason is to keep (as I said) the communication between client and server to a minimum. That's totally understandable. I'm still wondering about the answer to...

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 8:20 AM urkl ***@***.***> wrote: > It's because of the design of CustomField. Then listener being notified > triggers a call to this.updateValue() which...

Hi @xmas79, I'm reopening this issue because it is valid and a good improvement. I have been too busy to look at it but will do so eventually. Thanks.

The situation has improved since this bug was filed. In 016c3fe6 the `--erase` function deletes in parallel, and we list blocks 1000 at a time. s3backer still only deletes one...

Hi @zenovich , There is no test suite currently. The `tester` program is basically all we've got. Putting together some test scripts (for Linux) written in bash should not be...

Hmm. This looks like a some kind of kernel/NBD problem not specific to s3backer. E.g., see [this thread](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127098)). Unfortunately my familiarity with the inner guts of NBD is minimal.

> Confusingly it works with nbd-client 3.20. Could it be related to nbdkit? Definitely - it could be that there is a bug in newer nbd, or (more likely) something...

I have the same issue. The basic problem is this: there are many examples of field-level validation logic where the determination of "valid" depends on _other_ fields as well as...

Good point - though that's not an issue if, as in my case, you call `binder.setFieldsValidationStatusChangeListenerEnabled(false)` to defer validation until the form is submitted. In fact, the two kind of...