archpdx

Thanks for pointing that out @1ec5, I was looking at implementing these changes a couple months ago, and that was probably why I didn't end up opening a PR. I...

@tordans do you want me to repurpose this PR for the changes you made in https://github.com/arch0345/id-tagging-schema/pull/1 or would you prefer updating #331/creating a new PR?

Looks like it's outputting the full field for postcode for addresses points that don't have one, this doesn't seem to be an issue with unit

Looks like addresses were added in #6374 and parcels/buildings in #6805. It might be worth looking into whether those REST services are more up to date than the ones we're...

Looks like addresses were successful, merging as is for now

I don't think that disambiguators should be used in the network tag (this is what the network:wikidata tag is for)