Arunprasad Rajkumar
Arunprasad Rajkumar
I ran the [BenchmarkNewSeriesIngestion](https://github.com/timescale/promscale/blob/9a6e2d1cb2cb68edc928b70f83a0a3c24f6ca34a/pkg/tests/end_to_end_tests/metric_ingest_bench_test.go#L81) with varying batch sizes(2000, 5000, 10000) to ingest 10,000 series into the DB. Here is the result, ``` $ benchstat /tmp/1.txt /tmp/2.txt /tmp/3.txt name \ time/op...
Related to https://github.com/timescale/promscale/issues/1535
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Currently we support only `npm` based node ecosystem. `yarn` is also a popular one we should consider it too. `yarn`...
**Describe the bug** On the stack report UI, Transitive security issues tab is not populated with single click. It needs two clicks to populate on very first time. Further selection...
## Description This PR imports jaeger storage integration tests from https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/main/plugin/storage/integration and adopts those for promscale environment. As of now few tests like `GetLargeSpand` and `FindTraces` are commented and should...
Add integration tests for promscale in upstream jaeger so that we can claim promscale meets all the expectations. ### EDIT ### Summary Storage integration test failures shall be broadly classified...
Jaeger upstream already supports soft multi-tenancy. Implementing the tenancy model in promscale storage would help to gain further adoption. https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/issues/3427
There are few flags added recently(e.g. --tracing.async-acks) but not documented in timescale official doc. **To Reproduce** **Expected behavior** **Screenshots** If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem. **Configuration (as...
Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar