Martin Atkins

One detail that makes this a little tricky is the existing distinction between "module packages" and "module sources", which is something that is largely hidden in the details today but...

The test language's concept of "expected failures" is supposed to work with anything that is a "checkable object" by Terraform's definition, which includes `check` blocks and any objects that have...

It's not clear to me who ought to be responsible for reviewing that PR to go-getter, but looking at its source code I do see that it presents a challenge...

[My earlier comment](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/28490#issuecomment-1045008605) is the current recommendation.

Hi @orgads. Thanks for sharing this information. I notice a few different things about what you shared: 1. In the first case, as you pointed out, Terraform seems to acknowledge...

Hi @willdave865, Could you try running that `terraform plan` command again with the `TF_LOG=trace` environment variable set, and then share the verbose logging you see in a [GitHub Gist](https://gist.github.com/)? (It'll...

Thanks @willdave865! Indeed, this trace log seems to contain exactly what I was hoping for: ``` 2023-01-25T16:13:58.568+1300 [ERROR] provider.terraform-provider-azurerm_v3.40.0_x5.exe: Response contains error diagnostic: diagnostic_severity=ERROR tf_proto_version=5.3 tf_req_id=7fbc86ea-79cb-b0e2-0baf-ffa6c15c7081 @caller=github.com/hashicorp/[email protected]/tfprotov5/internal/diag/diagnostics.go:55 diagnostic_detail= diagnostic_summary="building account:...

I notice that #20114 upgraded the "terraform-plugin-go" library as a side-effect of its other changes, and so according to the release message in that PR the error message should now...

Hi @austinvalle, I must confess that I've not delved into all of the context you shared here because I'm about to go to lunch :confounded: but I did just want...

Terraform itself now responds to the environment variable `TF_FORK=0` to disable its attempts to use panicwrap.