Alexander Plavin

After some usage I quite like it, and may make a PR here soon :) The one inconvenience I noticed is: ```julia julia> obj = (name="A", values=(red=1, blue=2)) julia> sensitivities...

Oh, currently `pre` also fails :) I think https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/52986 + https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/54664 is still unresolved for 1.11, so let's wait for now...

Even though `pre` is still failing, I think it would be useful to add it anyway – for the future. Also, new commit fixes https://github.com/JuliaObjects/ConstructionBaseExtras.jl/issues/7. Will merge soon if noone...

See also this thread https://github.com/JuliaObjects/Accessors.jl/pull/93#discussion_r1152964082 for set!/reset discussion.

Which 1.11 version specifically? I ran tests on github actions for several versions, and both 1.11s fail with a different error: ```julia @accessor: Test Failed at /home/runner/work/Accessors.jl/Accessors.jl/test/test_core.jl:604 Expression: strip(string(#= /home/runner/work/Accessors.jl/Accessors.jl/test/test_core.jl:604...

Tests pass now, after https://github.com/JuliaObjects/Accessors.jl/pull/175. The issue from your first message here didn't manifest itself in the end, only the `@doc` regression :)

I personally also find the current order totally reasonable. Anyway, there's probably no objective better/worse here, and it's not worth a breaking change.

I noticed this missing in terms of actual underlying functionality, not syntax: that is, I haven't needed `@o _."abc"` syntax yet, but wanted a way to refer to arbitrary properties....

It doesn't affect optics that happen to include the actual symbol, right? ```julia julia> :&& :&& ```

Is there anything special with && and ||? `@o` nautrally doesn't support lots of Julia constructions throwing the same error: ```julia julia> @o x && _ julia> @o x ->...