Addison Phillips

Moving to v48. We already agreed that this will not make 47

In the 2025-04-07 call we decided that the next step is a design doc. I assigned that action to myself.

#1068 will resolve this item.

@eemeli I think the groupings are sometimes called 'types'. TR35 describes/demonstrates them [here](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-general.html#Example_Units) with a data file [here](https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/blob/main/common/validity/unit.xml). The prefix on each unit appears to be its type. Note that...

I don't get it? I don't see a lot of benefit to making developers write into their _code_ what optional-to-implement functionality is "enabled". Bear in mind that we would like...

@macchiati noted: > We could use one of the 25 reserved single-letter namespaces for that, without inventing any new syntax. > > Say o:calendar, for example? and also: > And...

In addition to the text @eemeli quotes, there is also this in the `u:locale` itself: > Implementations MAY emit a Bad Option error and MAY ignore the value of the...

Moving to v48 per 2025-02-17 call

(chair hat **OFF**) Adding `style=percent` to `:number` would not prevent us from having a convenience function `:percent` later (or now). This suggests that we prefer a "lumping" vs. "splitting" design...

@eemeli suggested: > If that is a requirement that we accept, then it suggests to me that we ought to include the category in the function name, so we'd have...