Addison Phillips

Retitled to avoid conflict with similarly named (but distinct) #21.

Removing `resolved-candidate` because this appears to be a request for plural selectors for ranges.

@stasm I agree that this issue is unclear and that it is possible to imagine a selector such a you describe. @mihnita I think that the only thing that could...

(as individual contributor) @eemeli that's what I had in mind, as well as synonyms like : ``` {:function arg1=$a arg2=$b ... argN=$x} {:function args=$someArray} ``` --- {:chair hat=ON} Okay, closing....

I think we have implicit answers to the questions originally proposed by @eemeli. I do think that we have a task of defining the XLIFF mapping (self-imposed in our goals).

Let's decide what to do with XLIFF mapping in an upcoming call.

We discussed this in the 2024-01-08 call. We will work on XLIFF again in the preview period.

Duplicates #38 ?

Closing resolve-candidates per discussion in 2023-07-24 call

This issue has been resolved: we are using an incompatible syntax.