Addison Phillips

@eemeli Good point. I do cover this to some degree inside the discussion of MF1, but will expand on it.

@mihnita Consider making comments on https://github.com/aphillips/message-format-wg/blob/issue-351/exploration/selection-matching-options.md as the discussion vehicle for this issue Monday.

Closing resolve-candidates per discussion in 2023-07-24 call

This appears to have been addressed? We now require selector expressions to have an annotation (either directly or in a declaration). Please reopen this issue or open new more-specific issues...

@eemeli I agree this is addressed. Leaving open now to give others time to review.

I suspect that this is either (a) the province of a function or selector or (b) out of scope. That is, one might implement what @eemeli mentions above to create...

Thanks @macchiati for the lovely illustration (which mirrors my thinking regarding format-to-parts behavior). I'm removing `resolve-candidate` for now, but observe that this issue is somewhat ill-defined in what it is...

I can't tell what this issue is about (what is being specifically proposed). I agree with @eemeli's observation about formatted parts identifying their placeholder. Does that mean we've addressed this?...

I am closing this issue because we have resolved that resource (file) formats are out of scope. The ABNF includes some features (related to whitespace handling) to help implementations of...

I have two comments on this: 1. Adding ranges to plural cannot work for the grammatical reasons enumerated above. We have multiple selection for a reason: it allows a separation...