tvm
tvm copied to clipboard
[Bug] [RISC-V RVV] sqrt operator shows poor vectorization performance
Issue: [RISC-V RVV] sqrt operator shows poor vectorization performance
Description
The sqrt (square root) operator performs poorly with the RISC‑V Vector (RVV) extension, achieving only 0.385× the performance of the scalar implementation. This is unexpected for a mathematical function that should see significant benefits from vectorization.
Steps to Reproduce
- Generate the sqrt operator with the following configuration:
params = {
"dtype": "float32",
"batch": 14,
"channels": 23,
"input_height": 67,
"input_width": 99
}
-
Export the operator to two targets:
-
RV target (scalar, without vector extension):
llvm -mtriple=riscv64-linux-gnu -mcpu=generic-rv64 -mabi=lp64d -mattr=+64bit,+m,+a,+f,+d,+c -
RVV target (with vector extension):
llvm -mtriple=riscv64-linux-gnu -mcpu=generic-rv64 -mabi=lp64d -mattr=+64bit,+m,+a,+f,+d,+c,+v
-
RV target (scalar, without vector extension):
-
Run performance measurement on both targets.
Operator definition code:
def export_sqrt(params, set_dir=None, platform="rv"):
data = relay.var("data",
shape=(params["batch"], params["channels"],
params["input_height"], params["input_width"]),
dtype=params["dtype"])
sqrt_op = relay.sqrt(data)
export_op(sqrt_op, params["op_name"], [data], params, set_dir=set_dir)
Performance Data
- RV execution time: 11.502000 ms
- RVV execution time: 29.906500 ms
- Acceleration ratio (RV/RVV): 0.385 (RVV is ~2.6× slower)
Environment Information
- TVM version: 0.19.0
-
LLVM version: [Please provide:
llvm-config --version] - Hardware: Spacemit K1‑X bit‑brick board
- CPU: Spacemit X60 (8 cores, 1.6 GHz)
- ISA: rv64imafdcv (with vector extensions)
- Memory: 7.6 GB
- OS: Bianbu 2.2, Linux kernel 6.6.63
- Operation: Elementwise square root on ~1.7M elements
Expected Behavior
RVV vectorization should provide a performance improvement over the scalar RV baseline for mathematical functions like square root.
Additional Context
- The sqrt operation is applied elementwise to a tensor of ~1.7M elements.
- The performance regression (2.6× slower) suggests that the vectorized implementation of sqrt may be using suboptimal instructions or inefficient vector length management.
- This is part of a broader pattern where multiple mathematical operators (log, sqrt, etc.) show severe performance degradation with RVV, indicating a potential issue with vector intrinsic mapping or loop vectorization for transcendental functions.