tinkerpop icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
tinkerpop copied to clipboard

Add String IdManager

Open danielcweber opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Add an IdManager that creates stringified UUIDs and accepts any non-empty string

danielcweber avatar Aug 26 '24 11:08 danielcweber

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.73%. Comparing base (9b46b67) to head (234955f). Report is 203 commits behind head on 3.7-dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...lin/tinkergraph/structure/AbstractTinkerGraph.java 40.00% 4 Missing and 2 partials :warning:
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             3.7-dev    #2743      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      76.14%   76.73%   +0.59%     
- Complexity     13152    13203      +51     
=============================================
  Files           1084     1087       +3     
  Lines          65160    66436    +1276     
  Branches        7285     7312      +27     
=============================================
+ Hits           49616    50981    +1365     
+ Misses         12839    12741      -98     
- Partials        2705     2714       +9     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

codecov-commenter avatar Aug 26 '24 11:08 codecov-commenter

Thanks @danielcweber, LGTM. VOTE +1

Cole-Greer avatar Aug 28 '24 16:08 Cole-Greer

VOTE +1

kenhuuu avatar Aug 30 '24 03:08 kenhuuu

VOTE +1. Thanks @danielcweber! I will go ahead and resolve the minor changelog conflict and merge this.

xiazcy avatar Sep 03 '24 16:09 xiazcy

Actually I just realized, we might still need some actions from your side @danielcweber, I see your base branch is on 3.7-dev but this PR is against master, which will be for future 4.0 release.

Did you intent for this change to go into master? If so, you can rebase your branch to master. I also don't have any particular concerns with this going into 3.7 either. Let me know your thoughts or if you have any questions around this. Thanks!

xiazcy avatar Sep 03 '24 16:09 xiazcy

It was meant to be on 3.7 which I usually am aware of...will rebase in a minute

danielcweber avatar Sep 04 '24 09:09 danielcweber

It was based on 3.7 already but became conflicted. Rebased it and changed the base branch in Github.

danielcweber avatar Sep 04 '24 09:09 danielcweber

I had a look into the failing checks but they seem unrelated

danielcweber avatar Sep 04 '24 10:09 danielcweber

I had a look into the failing checks but they seem unrelated

They do look unrelated so I just restarted the failing actions. I'll merge the PR today then. Thanks Daniel!

xiazcy avatar Sep 04 '24 17:09 xiazcy