tez
tez copied to clipboard
[TEZ-4315] rectifying the potential risk of ConcurrentModificationException when getMatchingRequestWithoutPriority
link to https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TEZ/issues/TEZ-4315
:broken_heart: -1 overall
Vote | Subsystem | Runtime | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
+0 :ok: | reexec | 14m 22s | Docker mode activated. |
_ Prechecks _ | |||
+1 :green_heart: | dupname | 0m 0s | No case conflicting files found. |
+1 :green_heart: | @author | 0m 0s | The patch does not contain any @author tags. |
-1 :x: | test4tests | 0m 0s | The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. |
_ master Compile Tests _ | |||
+1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 13m 10s | master passed |
+1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 44s | master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 |
+1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 35s | master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
+1 :green_heart: | checkstyle | 1m 17s | master passed |
+1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 46s | master passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 |
+1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 36s | master passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
+0 :ok: | spotbugs | 1m 44s | Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs. |
+1 :green_heart: | findbugs | 1m 42s | master passed |
_ Patch Compile Tests _ | |||
+1 :green_heart: | mvninstall | 0m 28s | the patch passed |
+1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 31s | the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 |
+1 :green_heart: | javac | 0m 31s | the patch passed |
+1 :green_heart: | compile | 0m 25s | the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
+1 :green_heart: | javac | 0m 25s | the patch passed |
+1 :green_heart: | checkstyle | 0m 22s | tez-dag: The patch generated 0 new + 97 unchanged - 2 fixed = 97 total (was 99) |
+1 :green_heart: | whitespace | 0m 0s | The patch has no whitespace issues. |
+1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 25s | the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 |
+1 :green_heart: | javadoc | 0m 23s | the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
+1 :green_heart: | findbugs | 1m 16s | the patch passed |
_ Other Tests _ | |||
+1 :green_heart: | unit | 4m 29s | tez-dag in the patch passed. |
+1 :green_heart: | asflicense | 0m 14s | The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. |
42m 40s |
Subsystem | Report/Notes |
---|---|
Docker | ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-133/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile |
GITHUB PR | https://github.com/apache/tez/pull/133 |
Optional Tests | dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs checkstyle compile |
uname | Linux 681a0071a93e 4.15.0-112-generic #113-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 9 23:41:39 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
Build tool | maven |
Personality | personality/tez.sh |
git revision | master / d443ae2b3 |
Default Java | Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
Multi-JDK versions | /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10 |
Test Results | https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-133/1/testReport/ |
Max. process+thread count | 188 (vs. ulimit of 5500) |
modules | C: tez-dag U: tez-dag |
Console output | https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/tez-multibranch/job/PR-133/1/console |
versions | git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 findbugs=3.0.1 |
Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
How often have you observed the ConcurrentModificationException? When I look at the code base, the callers of those functions are synchronized at the function level. Please 1) attach a stack trace if possible or 2) create a test that shows how this is possible or 3) Explain the code path more precisely.
@chenjunbiao001, can can provide a stack trace of the ConcurrentModificationException? I am unable to find a code path that will exercise the problem in practice.