Exclude vulnerable commons-collections 3.2.2 SONATYPE-2024-3350
https://nexus-iq.visa.com/assets/index.html#/vulnerabilities/SONATYPE-2024-3350
@xiangfu0 @Jackie-Jiang please review and help to merge
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 55.63%. Comparing base (3be9fbe) to head (758d471).
:warning: Report is 7 commits behind head on master.
:exclamation: There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3be9fbe) and HEAD (758d471). Click for more details.
HEAD has 32 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (3be9fbe) HEAD (758d471) java-21 5 1 unittests 4 2 temurin 10 2 java-11 5 1 unittests2 2 0 integration 6 0 integration2 2 0 integration1 2 0 custom-integration1 2 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #17393 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 63.28% 55.63% -7.65%
+ Complexity 1474 703 -771
============================================
Files 3147 2460 -687
Lines 187576 138874 -48702
Branches 28712 22138 -6574
============================================
- Hits 118712 77268 -41444
+ Misses 59663 55104 -4559
+ Partials 9201 6502 -2699
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| custom-integration1 | ? |
|
| integration | ? |
|
| integration1 | ? |
|
| integration2 | ? |
|
| java-11 | 55.59% <ø> (-7.62%) |
:arrow_down: |
| java-21 | 55.59% <ø> (-7.64%) |
:arrow_down: |
| temurin | 55.63% <ø> (-7.65%) |
:arrow_down: |
| unittests | 55.63% <ø> (-7.65%) |
:arrow_down: |
| unittests1 | 55.63% <ø> (-0.02%) |
:arrow_down: |
| unittests2 | ? |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
commons-beanutils depends on commons-collections, and we cannot remove it. We'll need to wait until either of them releases a new version
commons-beanutilsdepends oncommons-collections, and we cannot remove it. We'll need to wait until either of them releases a new version
where its being used i guess we use commons-collections4 right ?
commons-beanutilsdepends oncommons-collections, and we cannot remove it. We'll need to wait until either of them releases a new versionwhere its being used i guess we use commons-collections4 right ?
It is not being used directly, but commons-beanutils could use it indirectly, and cause class not found issue