DO NOT MERGE: Expand BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT to support FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY, INT32 and INT64

[pitrou]

Implement the format additions described in PARQUET-2414.

TODO:

• [ ] Wait for format additions to be voted on
• [ ] Create corresponding JIRA issue and link to it
• [ ] Update integration testing changeset once testing file is merged

Jira

• [ ] My PR addresses the following Parquet Jira issues and references them in the PR title. For example, "PARQUET-1234: My Parquet PR"
  • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-XXX
  • In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.

Tests

• [x] My PR adds the following unit tests OR does not need testing for this extremely good reason:

Commits

• [ ] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "How to write a good git commit message":
  1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
  2. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
  3. Subject does not end with a period
  4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
  5. Body wraps at 72 characters
  6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"

Style

• [x] My contribution adheres to the code style guidelines and Spotless passes.
  • To apply the necessary changes, run mvn spotless:apply -Pvector-plugins

Documentation

• [x] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it.
  • All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain Javadoc that explain what it does

[pitrou]

@wgtmac @etseidl @gszadovszky This is a draft PR. It works fine on the integration test but still needs unit tests. Since I'm quite new to this codebase (and to Java in general), I welcome any early comments.

[pitrou]

This is ready for review now. The only failing test is the interop test, since the required file is not in parquet-testing yet (I have checked it passes locally).

[pitrou]

For the record, I must still address some of the review comments.

[pitrou]

@gszadovszky I think I addressed your comments, could you take another look?

[wgtmac]

@pitrou Do you want to have this in the 1.14.0 release?