Tracking issues of RFC-6213: Options API
- RFC PR: https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/6213
Migrate bindings to use the new options APIs.
- [ ] java
- [ ] python
- [ ] nodejs
- [ ] c
Should we create sub-tasks tracking for adding each option type to the language bindings. That might help us avoid huge PRs, and we can surface some great first issues!
Should we create sub-tasks tracking for adding each option type to the language bindings. That might help us avoid huge PRs, and we can surface some great first issues!
That's a good idea! However, I'm not familiar with bindings development. Maybe you could start a tracking issue for the Java binding?
possible additions from https://github.com/apache/opendal/issues/6227 ?
Node.js migration has been completed. #6281