nuttx
nuttx copied to clipboard
apache
audio: add AUDIO_MSG_IOERR msg to meida service
Summary
add AUDIO_CALLBACK_IOERR handle and AUDIO_MSG_IOERR msg to user
Impact
none
Testing
none
[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]
No, the PR does not meet the NuttX requirements.
Missing Information:
-
Summary:
- Why is the change necessary? Is this a fix, update, or new feature? What problem does it solve?
- What functional part of the code is being changed? Be specific. E.g., "audio driver for codec X", "I2C bus driver", etc.
- How does the change exactly work? Provide details about the implementation of the
AUDIO_CALLBACK_IOERRhandle andAUDIO_MSG_IOERRmessage.
-
Impact:
- "None" is rarely the answer. Even if the change seems small, there might be impacts.
- Consider:
- Error handling: Does this change how errors are reported or handled? Could this affect existing applications?
- Code size: Does adding the new handle and message increase the code size?
- Performance: Is there any potential impact on audio performance?
-
Testing:
- "None" is not acceptable. You must provide testing details to demonstrate that the changes work as intended and do not introduce regressions.
- Include:
- Specific build host details (OS, CPU, compiler version).
- Target details (architecture, board, configuration).
- Clear testing logs showing the behavior before and after the change. Ideally, demonstrate how the new error handle and message are used.
Recommendations:
- Expand the Summary section with detailed explanations of the change's purpose, functionality, and implementation.
- Thoroughly analyze the Impact section. Consider all potential impacts, even if they seem minor.
- Provide concrete Testing information. Include build host and target details and relevant testing logs.
By addressing these points, you will significantly improve the quality of your PR and increase the likelihood of it being accepted.
@yangyalei meida -> media??
sorry, I merged this patch a little bit eerily:( since the change is very simple.
