Convert more classes to record classes

[shubhamvishu]

Description

• This PR addresses #13207 to convert more classes on main branch to record classes on main (Lucene 10 only).
• It moves a lot of data classes(120 to be precise) to use record classes that were flagged suitable in my IDE and seemed good candidate in general.
• I left a couple of them like TotalHits and SynonymMap as the PR is already very big and including those were leading to a lot more changes. Maybe we could do those as a separate PR.

  Raising this PR since all the tests are passing(./gradlew test) but renderJavadoc task is complaining about missing java docs on some record classes(converted in this PR) which I see has the javadocs already eg: TermStats, ReaderSlice. I'm not sure why its flagging those incorrectly or if maybe I'm missing something.

[uschindler]

Hi, you can merge main into your branch and hopefully checks pass. For some packages like the "codecs" one, the new code requires you to also document all record components with @param.

[shubhamvishu]

I addressed your comments in the new revision and all the checks are passing now after your fix. Thanks!

[uschindler]

Thanks, looks fine. I have no time to do another closer review, please give me some time to proceed.

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

[uschindler]

Hi @shubhamvishu, can you check my comments? The changes here look fine, please fix the remaining issues. Uwe

[shubhamvishu]

Hi @uschindler , sorry I was on vacation until last week, so this PR stalled. I'll take a look at the comments today or tomorrow.

Update : Got stuck with some other work. Will take a look at this sometime this week.

[shubhamvishu]

Hi @uschindler , thanks for the review. I took another pass at the changes and pushed some commits addressing your comments. Please have a look when you get a chance. Thanks!

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

[shubhamvishu]

Hi @uschindler, Could you please review the current code changes once you get some time and if it looks good maybe we can move this forward?

[github-actions[bot]]

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

[stefanvodita]

Added the blocker label to draw attention to this PR for the Lucene 10 release.

[shubhamvishu]

Hi @uschindler @mikemccand @jpountz , I fixed the recent merge conflicts and looking for reviews as 10.0 release is blocked on this change. This PR has been attracting merge conflicts frequently since its touching 200+ files, so hoping we could close this sooner. Let me know if there is any concerns here(I'm up for quick followups). Thanks!

[shubhamvishu]

@jpountz I addressed your comments and added a CHANGES, MIGRATE entry now. Thanks for reviewing!

[stefanvodita]

I think we've run into a conflict with #13689. @jpountz - should I fix that or are you already doing it?

[jpountz]

@javanna just fixed it, thanks @javanna !