lucene icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
lucene copied to clipboard

Add Facets#getBulkSpecificValues method

Open epotyom opened this issue 1 year ago • 7 comments

Add Facets#getBulkSpecificValues method and implemented it in every class that implements getSpecificValue.

Also moved FacetLabel class one level up from org.apache.lucene.facet.taxonomy to org.apache.lucene.facet to be able to use it as argument for getBulkSpecificValues.

Issue #12919

epotyom avatar Nov 30 '23 18:11 epotyom

Thank you fore reviewing @mikemccand ! Resolved your comments in 2nd commit.

epotyom avatar Dec 08 '23 17:12 epotyom

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

github-actions[bot] avatar Jan 08 '24 12:01 github-actions[bot]

@mikemccand oh I've just realised that replying to code line comment doesn't send a notification!

Thank you for reviewing, I listed some alternatives above, but I still think that current approach is better and I think it's ok to only merge to 10.0, but please let me know if you think otherwise.

I've rebased the branch to resolve conflicts.

epotyom avatar Jan 09 '24 07:01 epotyom

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

github-actions[bot] avatar Jan 24 '24 00:01 github-actions[bot]

@epotyom I'd be happy to do a pass on this and help get it merged if you like. Would you mind resolving the current merge conflicts then I'll have a look?

gsmiller avatar Feb 28 '24 21:02 gsmiller

gsmiller

@epotyom I'd be happy to do a pass on this and help get it merged if you like. Would you mind resolving the current merge conflicts then I'll have a look?

Thanks @gsmiller , I've rebased the branch.

epotyom avatar Mar 01 '24 18:03 epotyom

@epotyom I saw Mike already approved. I did my own pass anyway so I understand the changes. They look good. Thanks! I left one small question for you about a default implementation. Let's resolve that open question then I'll merge.

gsmiller avatar Mar 05 '24 21:03 gsmiller

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

github-actions[bot] avatar Mar 20 '24 00:03 github-actions[bot]

Thank you for reviewing @gsmiller ! I've addressed your comments and updated the branch.

epotyom avatar Mar 20 '24 23:03 epotyom

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

github-actions[bot] avatar Apr 10 '24 00:04 github-actions[bot]

Hmm it looks like this change was nearly ready to be merged? But code has since drifted and the PR now has some rust (conflicts)?

mikemccand avatar Aug 19 '24 16:08 mikemccand