jena icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
jena copied to clipboard

Bump ver.slf4j from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0

Open dependabot[bot] opened this issue 3 years ago • 3 comments

Bumps ver.slf4j from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0. Updates slf4j-api from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0

Commits
  • 0614d46 prepare release 2.0.0
  • b1afcd0 javadoc edits
  • 20cd3ad start work on 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
  • aeebb61 prepare release 2.0.0-beta1
  • 1068cd0 javadoc changes
  • 4e4e56a add CheckReturnValue annotation in org.slf4j.helpers
  • 0dcfa19 check for return value in some oggingEventBuilder methods
  • e7ca8d1 start work on 2.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOPT
  • 2314de9 add setMessage and log method to the fluent API
  • 508a796 set version to 2.0.0-beta0
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Updates slf4j-jdk14 from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0

Commits
  • 0614d46 prepare release 2.0.0
  • b1afcd0 javadoc edits
  • 20cd3ad start work on 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
  • aeebb61 prepare release 2.0.0-beta1
  • 1068cd0 javadoc changes
  • 4e4e56a add CheckReturnValue annotation in org.slf4j.helpers
  • 0dcfa19 check for return value in some oggingEventBuilder methods
  • e7ca8d1 start work on 2.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOPT
  • 2314de9 add setMessage and log method to the fluent API
  • 508a796 set version to 2.0.0-beta0
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Updates jcl-over-slf4j from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0

Commits
  • 0614d46 prepare release 2.0.0
  • b1afcd0 javadoc edits
  • 20cd3ad start work on 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
  • aeebb61 prepare release 2.0.0-beta1
  • 1068cd0 javadoc changes
  • 4e4e56a add CheckReturnValue annotation in org.slf4j.helpers
  • 0dcfa19 check for return value in some oggingEventBuilder methods
  • e7ca8d1 start work on 2.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOPT
  • 2314de9 add setMessage and log method to the fluent API
  • 508a796 set version to 2.0.0-beta0
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Updates jul-to-slf4j from 1.7.36 to 2.0.0

Commits
  • 0614d46 prepare release 2.0.0
  • b1afcd0 javadoc edits
  • 20cd3ad start work on 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT
  • aeebb61 prepare release 2.0.0-beta1
  • 1068cd0 javadoc changes
  • 4e4e56a add CheckReturnValue annotation in org.slf4j.helpers
  • 0dcfa19 check for return value in some oggingEventBuilder methods
  • e7ca8d1 start work on 2.0.0-beta1-SNAPSHOPT
  • 2314de9 add setMessage and log method to the fluent API
  • 508a796 set version to 2.0.0-beta0
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

dependabot[bot] avatar Sep 01 '22 00:09 dependabot[bot]

Let's wait on this one.

If Jena uses 2.0.0, it may block downstream still using 1.7.x.

slf4j 2.0.0 setup works differently to 1.7 (2.0.0 uses service loaders, 1.7.x has it's own private mechanism.

1.8.x didn't get out of beta.

As there is no rush here, let's see how the rest of the world gets on with 2.0.0.

afs avatar Sep 01 '22 10:09 afs

So the question for Jena upgrading is whether slf4j-api 2.0.0 if jena updates, is compatible with 1.7.x slf4j implementations (client apps using jena).

The answer is "no". It looks like a long-timescale change over unless adapters appear.

https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200

So I suggest we do not upgrade, wait to see what happens in the rest of the world, and close this PR.

afs avatar Sep 07 '22 15:09 afs

Slight bump in the road: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3601

If that is not accepted, each inclusion of log4j-slf4j2-impl needs to be paired with an inclusion of log4j-core.

afs avatar Sep 18 '22 09:09 afs

Superseded by #1568.

dependabot[bot] avatar Oct 01 '22 00:10 dependabot[bot]