apache
Flink Support for TIMESTAMP_NANOS data type for PARQUET
only includes changes to support timestamp_nanos on Flink for PARQUET. AVRO can be done in a new PR looks like ORC doesn't support NANO precision
Do the schema conversions handle the nano ts correctly? Do we get a Timestamp(9) when we convert to Flink schema, or a nano timestamp when we convert from the Iceberg schema?
Do the schema conversions handle the nano ts correctly? Do we get a
Timestamp(9)when we convert to Flink schema, or a nano timestamp when we convert from the Iceberg schema?
👍🏻
There are several tests which are using DataGenerator to generate test data - do we want to add nanos to them?
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.