HDFS-17476. fix: False positive "Observer Node is too far behind" due to long overflow.

[KeeProMise]

Description of PR

seeAlse : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17476 In the code GlobalStateIdContext#receiveRequestState(), if clientStateId is a small negative number, clientStateId-serverStateId may be greater than

（ESTIMATED_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SECOND due to overflow * TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toSeconds(clientWaitTime) * ESTIMATED_SERVER_TIME_MULTIPLIER）,

resulting in false positives that Observer Node is too far behind.

How was this patch tested?

hi, I'm not sure whether I need to add a new UT. I think the existing UT is ok.

For code changes:

• [x] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?