Fix watermark alignment explanation in documentation
according to the following description and the flag should be false,then make sense.
What is the purpose of the change
(For example: This pull request makes task deployment go through the blob server, rather than through RPC. That way we avoid re-transferring them on each deployment (during recovery).)
Brief change log
(for example:)
- The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact
- Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference
- TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache
Verifying this change
Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow the conventions for tests defined in our code quality guide.
(Please pick either of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
- Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
- Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
- Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries
- Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
- Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
- The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with
@Public(Evolving): (yes / no) - The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
- The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
- Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
- The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)
Documentation
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
CI report:
- daacf07e87087eaf043cb0171e37a332abe5c8c3 Azure: SUCCESS
Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:@flinkbot run azurere-run the last Azure build
OK,I have created PR. https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/27227
At 2025-11-11 22:37:08, "David Radley" @.***> wrote:
@davidradl requested changes on this pull request.
Please correct the chinese version as well. https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/1029df0f6bc85b892abdd0453101d037b4a6c9b4/docs/content.zh/docs/dev/datastream/event-time/generating_watermarks.md#L4
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>