[ISSUE #3887] The method of verifying no exception thrown is not appropriate

[pandaapo]

Fixes #3887.

Motivation

See "Enhancement Request" in issue.

Modifications

See "Describe the solution you'd like" in issue.

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
• If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
• If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #3889 (e532cc3) into master (0ce8d57) will decrease coverage by 0.31%. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

:exclamation: Current head e532cc3 differs from pull request most recent head 63953ba. Consider uploading reports for the commit 63953ba to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3889      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     14.24%   13.93%   -0.31%     
+ Complexity     1320     1292      -28     
============================================
  Files           579      570       -9     
  Lines         28967    28848     -119     
  Branches       2802     2811       +9     
============================================
- Hits           4125     4020     -105     
- Misses        24450    24455       +5     
+ Partials        392      373      -19     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...n/loadbalance/WeightRandomLoadBalanceSelector.java	88.00% <100.00%> (+0.50%)	:arrow_up:

... and 143 files with indirect coverage changes

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[github-actions[bot]]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 13.93%. Comparing base (0ce8d57) to head (e532cc3). Report is 533 commits behind head on master.

:exclamation: Current head e532cc3 differs from pull request most recent head 63953ba

Please upload reports for the commit 63953ba to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3889      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     14.24%   13.93%   -0.31%     
+ Complexity     1320     1292      -28     
============================================
  Files           579      570       -9     
  Lines         28967    28848     -119     
  Branches       2802     2811       +9     
============================================
- Hits           4125     4020     -105     
- Misses        24450    24455       +5     
+ Partials        392      373      -19     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

[github-actions[bot]]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.