eventmesh
eventmesh copied to clipboard
[ISSUE #3880] Optimize ClientSessionGroupMapping
Fixes #3880
Motivation
Explain the content here. Explain why you want to make the changes and what problem you're trying to solve.
Modifications
- Optimize ClientSessionGroupMapping
- change ConcurrentHashMap<InetSocketAddress, Session> to ConcurrentHashMap<String, Session>
Documentation
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
- If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
- If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation
Codecov Report
Merging #3881 (214e6e1) into master (e1e9aca) will increase coverage by
0.00%. The diff coverage is1.96%.
:exclamation: Current head 214e6e1 differs from pull request most recent head 0364e2d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0364e2d to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3881 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 13.93% 13.93%
Complexity 1291 1291
=========================================
Files 570 570
Lines 28847 28833 -14
Branches 2811 2809 -2
=========================================
Hits 4019 4019
+ Misses 24455 24441 -14
Partials 373 373
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| ...e/admin/handler/RedirectClientByIpPortHandler.java | 31.37% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...dmin/handler/RedirectClientBySubSystemHandler.java | 9.09% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| .../runtime/admin/handler/RejectAllClientHandler.java | 12.50% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...ime/admin/handler/RejectClientByIpPortHandler.java | 9.30% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| .../admin/handler/RejectClientBySubSystemHandler.java | 8.33% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...ntime/admin/handler/ShowClientBySystemHandler.java | 15.38% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...tmesh/runtime/admin/handler/ShowClientHandler.java | 14.81% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...ntmesh/runtime/admin/handler/TCPClientHandler.java | 4.34% <0.00%> (+0.09%) |
:arrow_up: |
| .../runtime/admin/request/DeleteTCPClientRequest.java | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| ...ol/tcp/client/group/ClientSessionGroupMapping.java | 0.81% <0.00%> (+0.03%) |
:arrow_up: |
| ... and 3 more |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.
If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 1.96078% with 50 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 13.93%. Comparing base (
e1e9aca) to head (214e6e1). Report is 604 commits behind head on master.
:exclamation: Current head 214e6e1 differs from pull request most recent head 0364e2d
Please upload reports for the commit 0364e2d to get more accurate results.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3881 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 13.93% 13.93%
Complexity 1291 1291
=========================================
Files 570 570
Lines 28847 28833 -14
Branches 2811 2809 -2
=========================================
Hits 4019 4019
+ Misses 24455 24441 -14
Partials 373 373
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.
If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.
It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.
If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.