[Bug] the second log Y axis affects the first log

[FM3631]

Version

5.2.2

Link to Minimal Reproduction

Reproduction Link

Steps to Reproduce

Current Behavior

Expected Behavior

The two don't affect each other.

Environment

- OS:
- Browser:
- Framework:

Any additional comments?

[echarts-bot[bot]]

@FM3631 It seems you are not using English, I've helped translate the content automatically. To make your issue understood by more people and get helped, we'd like to suggest using English next time. 🤗

TRANSLATED

TITLE

[Bug] Gird contains multiple Y axes, when multiple Y axis types are set to 'log' at the same time, the second Y axis affects the first Y axis, which god tells the little brother

BODY

Version

5.2.2

Link to Minimal Reproduction

No response

Steps to Reproduce

Direct copy can see the phenomenon in echarts

Current Behavior

// prettier-ignore const data = [["2000-06-05", 116], ["2000-06-06", 129], ["2000-06-07", 135], ["2000-06-08", 86 ], ["2000-06-09", 73], ["2000-06-10", 85], ["2000-06-11", 73], ["2000-06-12", 68], ["2000-06-13", 92], ["2000-06-14", 130], ["2000-06-15", 245], ["2000-06-16", 139], [" 2000-06-17", 115], ["2000-06-18", 111], ["2000-06-19", 309], ["2000-06-20", 206], ["2000- 06-21", 137], ["2000-06-22", 128], ["2000-06-23", 85], ["2000-06-24", 94], ["2000-06- 25", 71], ["2000-06-26", 106], ["2000-06-27", 84], ["2000-06-28", 93], ["2000-06-29" , 85], ["2000-06-30", 73], ["2000-07-01", 83], ["2000-07-02", 125], ["2000-07-03", 107 ], ["2000-07-04", 82], ["2000-07-05", 44], ["2000-07-06", 72], ["2000-07-07", 106], ["2000-07-08", 107], ["2000-07-09", 66], ["2000-07-10", 91], ["2000-07-11", 92], [" 2000-07-12", 113], ["2000-07-13", 107], ["2000-07-14", 131], ["2000-07-15", 111], ["2000- 07-16", 64], ["2000-07-17", 69], ["2000-07-18", 88], ["2000-07-19", 77], ["2000-07- 20", 83], ["2000-07-21", 111], ["2000-07-22", 57], ["20 00-07-23", 55], ["2000-07-24", 60]]; const dateList = data.map(function (item) { return item[0]; }); const valueList = data.map(function (item) { return item[1]; }); option = { title: [ { left: 'center', text: 'Gradient along the y axis' }, { top: '55%', left: 'center', text: 'Gradient along the x axis' } ], tooltip: { trigger: 'axis' }, xAxis: [ { data: dateList }, { data: dateList, gridIndex: 1 } ], yAxis: [ { type: 'log', min: 0.01 }, { type: 'log', gridIndex: 1,

  min: 0.1,
  axisLabel: {
    fontSize: '34'
  }
}

], grid: [ { bottom: '60%' }, { top: '60%' } ], series: [ { type: 'line', showSymbol: false, data: valueList }, { type: 'line', showSymbol: false, data: valueList, xAxisIndex: 1, yAxisIndex: 1 } ] };

Expected Behavior

1

Environment

- OS:
- Browser:
- Framework:

Any additional comments?

none

[jiawulin001]

Problem locating

This problem exist here: https://github.com/apache/echarts/blob/5cf53e24ac751650ce8d76dde957f1b0d0bd50e6/src/scale/Log.ts#L74-L76 When Echarts tries to obtain the extent of data and set ticks, it's trying to use the precision of originalExtent to fix powVal. This behavior is to fix the problem of #4158, where precision issue is caused by logarithm and exponentiation. However here powVal can be user-set min/max, which is 0.01 here and originalExtent is the real extent of data, which is 44 here. When using the precision of 44 to fix 0.01, tick value becomes 0 and it has nowhere to go on log axis. That's the reason why there's a big 0 up there.

Plan to fix

The way to fix #4158 is not fixing it completely (a user-set max of 2000000000000 still displays wrongly) and it also causes #16992. My plan is to change the way to fix #4158 and can fix #16992 in the same time.

Submitting a PR to solve this

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you wish not to mark it as stale, please leave a comment in this issue.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically closed because it did not have recent activity. If this remains to be a problem with the latest version of Apache ECharts, please open a new issue and link this to it. Thanks!