chore: Prepare for DataFusion 48.0.0
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1709
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
How are these changes tested?
failures are due to return_field_from_args should be called instead
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 58.60%. Comparing base (
f09f8af) to head (2b2b085). Report is 200 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1710 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 56.12% 58.60% +2.47%
- Complexity 976 1138 +162
============================================
Files 119 130 +11
Lines 11743 12663 +920
Branches 2251 2362 +111
============================================
+ Hits 6591 7421 +830
- Misses 4012 4058 +46
- Partials 1140 1184 +44
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
Is it possible to have arrow-rs 55.1.0 in datafusion 48.0.0.? A performance improvement went in for int8/int16 which was as a result of the unsigned int issues we raised. The perf improvement also addresses the unsigned int issue which will allow us to clean up a lot of code/tests.
Is it possible to have arrow-rs 55.1.0 in datafusion 48.0.0.? A performance improvement went in for int8/int16 which was as a result of the unsigned int issues we raised. The perf improvement also addresses the unsigned int issue which will allow us to clean up a lot of code/tests.
DataFusion main branch already uses arrow-rs 55.1.0: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/963b649d1e021e2516c2d652a8aa9fc486a5a1ba/Cargo.toml#L91