removing the usage of volumeFreeze StorPool API call

[slavkap]

Description

Deprecate the usage of the volumeFreeze API call.

Types of changes

• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• [X] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• [ ] build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• [ ] Major
• [x] Minor

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 41 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 23.10%. Comparing base (8f6721e) to head (23e3f20).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...tastore/driver/StorPoolPrimaryDataStoreDriver.java	0.00%	36 Missing :warning:
...ack/storage/motion/StorPoolDataMotionStrategy.java	0.00%	5 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #8575      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     30.90%   23.10%   -7.80%     
+ Complexity    33382    23318   -10064     
============================================
  Files          5355     5219     -136     
  Lines        375727   353392   -22335     
  Branches      54915    50877    -4038     
============================================
- Hits         116109    81663   -34446     
- Misses       244219   259918   +15699     
+ Partials      15399    11811    -3588     

Flag	Coverage Δ
simulator-marvin-tests	24.77% <0.00%> (+0.01%)	:arrow_up:
uitests	4.36% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 4.17%. Comparing base (0ec7c72) to head (d099649). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main   #8575      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   4.17%   4.17%   -0.01%     
========================================
  Files        371     371              
  Lines      30383   30407      +24     
  Branches    5374    5384      +10     
========================================
  Hits        1269    1269              
- Misses     28970   28994      +24     
  Partials     144     144              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.17% <ø> (-0.01%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sureshanaparti]

Ping @slavkap Any further work on this?

[slavkap]

hey @sureshanaparti, no, I think all needed is included

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10170

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.