Standardize and auto add license headers to properties files
Description
This PR refs #12230
Types of changes
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
- [X] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
- [ ] Build/CI
- [ ] Test (unit or integration test code)
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
- [ ] Major
- [X] Minor
Bug Severity
- [ ] BLOCKER
- [ ] Critical
- [ ] Major
- [ ] Minor
- [ ] Trivial
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 17.46%. Comparing base (cfe9602) to head (2688e97).
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12231 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 17.45% 17.46%
- Complexity 15513 15515 +2
=========================================
Files 5913 5913
Lines 529385 529385
Branches 64679 64679
=========================================
+ Hits 92426 92450 +24
+ Misses 426541 426517 -24
Partials 10418 10418
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| uitests | 3.58% <ø> (ø) |
|
| unittests | 18.52% <ø> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
@blueorangutan package
@jbampton a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 15992
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16000