cleanup LDAP code according to warnings
Description
This PR was part of investigation into the current LDAP workings, to find out that the issue under investigation was a user issue. I think this can be merged, but it has no functional changes.
Types of changes
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
- [x] Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
- [ ] build/CI
- [ ] test (unit or integration test code)
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
- [ ] Major
- [ ] Minor
Bug Severity
- [ ] BLOCKER
- [ ] Critical
- [ ] Major
- [ ] Minor
- [ ] Trivial
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?
Codecov Report
:x: Patch coverage is 41.17647% with 110 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 17.50%. Comparing base (2ac2e5b) to head (2983839).
:warning: Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11436 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 3.58% 17.50% +13.91%
- Complexity 0 15564 +15564
============================================
Files 445 5914 +5469
Lines 37571 529642 +492071
Branches 6921 64702 +57781
============================================
+ Hits 1347 92691 +91344
- Misses 36058 426503 +390445
- Partials 166 10448 +10282
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| uitests | 3.58% <ø> (ø) |
|
| unittests | 18.56% <41.17%> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16076
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15017) Environment: kvm-ol9 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol9 Total time taken: 55148 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11436-t15017-kvm-ol9.zip Smoke tests completed. 149 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:
| Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File |
|---|---|---|---|
| test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster | Failure |
26.65 | test_kubernetes_clusters.py |