[AMORO-3998]support DATABASE HA SERVICE

[LiangDai-Mars]

Why are the changes needed?

Please refer to issue https://github.com/apache/amoro/issues/3998.

Brief change log

How was this patch tested?

• [ ] Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• [ ] Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• [ ] Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 13.86555% with 205 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 29.39%. Comparing base (cbdc517) to head (343dce8). :warning: Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...amoro/server/ha/JdbcHighAvailabilityContainer.java	0.00%	134 Missing :warning:
...g/apache/amoro/server/persistence/HaLeaseMeta.java	0.00%	49 Missing :warning:
...ro/server/ha/HighAvailabilityContainerFactory.java	33.33%	7 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
...che/amoro/server/AmoroManagementConfValidator.java	36.36%	5 Missing and 2 partials :warning:
...amoro/server/ha/NoopHighAvailabilityContainer.java	25.00%	6 Missing :warning:
...e/amoro/server/ha/ZkHighAvailabilityContainer.java	50.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3997      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     22.12%   29.39%   +7.26%     
- Complexity     2461     3995    +1534     
============================================
  Files           445      643     +198     
  Lines         40897    51647   +10750     
  Branches       5767     6554     +787     
============================================
+ Hits           9050    15181    +6131     
- Misses        31089    35397    +4308     
- Partials        758     1069     +311     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	29.39% <13.86%> (?)
trino	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.