[AMORO-2553] Parallelize reading of EQ delete files and cache them on optimizers
Why are the changes needed?
Close #2553.
Brief change log
How was this patch tested?
-
[ ] Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible
-
[ ] Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate
-
[ ] Run test locally before making a pull request
Documentation
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 55.60976% with 91 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 34.08%. Comparing base (
92730de) to head (371a390). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2584 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 34.71% 34.08% -0.64%
+ Complexity 4521 4397 -124
============================================
Files 608 608
Lines 50980 50919 -61
Branches 6686 6678 -8
============================================
- Hits 17700 17354 -346
- Misses 31827 32159 +332
+ Partials 1453 1406 -47
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| core | 32.36% <55.60%> (-0.71%) |
:arrow_down: |
| trino | 50.93% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.