Support the unpack operator in signature

[jabbera]

Support the unpack operator in operator signature.

Closes: #41286

---

^ Add meaningful description above Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed. In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy. In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[boring-cyborg[bot]]

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contributors' Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/README.rst) Here are some useful points:

• Pay attention to the quality of your code (ruff, mypy and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
• In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
• Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it's a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
• Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
• Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
• Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
• Always keep your Pull Requests rebased, otherwise your build might fail due to changes not related to your commits. Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀. In case of doubts contact the developers at: Mailing List: [email protected] Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

[romsharon98]

The changes look good — great work for a first PR! 😉 I think better add tests here, let me know what you think.

[jabbera]

I think better add tests here, let me know what you think.

@romsharon98 test_operator_helpers doesn't have the create_ti function/infrastructure that's available in test_python. I could put the determine method under test directly in test_operator_helpers instead of actually executing a task if that's what you mean?

[romsharon98]

I think better add tests here, let me know what you think.

@romsharon98 test_operator_helpers doesn't have the create_ti function/infrastructure that's available in test_python. I could put the determine method under test directly in test_operator_helpers instead of actually executing a task if that's what you mean?

Yes, this is what I meant.

[jabbera]

@romsharon98 Sorry for the delay. This is all set. Branch rebased.

[romsharon98]

changes looks good! static tests failed, better working with pre-commit and prevent those errors.

[jabbera]

static tests failed, better working with pre-commit and prevent those errors.

All set!

[jabbera]

Hi, is there anything else needed for this PR? Thanks!

[boring-cyborg[bot]]

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to check our Issue Tracker for additional contributions.