github-readme-stats
github-readme-stats copied to clipboard
Reorganize docs in readme
Resolves #2236. Moves options docs into the sections for the cards they're for and streamlines readme so detailed examples are collapsed by default.
@mezzode is attempting to deploy a commit to the github readme stats Team on Vercel.
A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.
@mezzode Thanks a lot for this pull request it improves the README.md. The only thing that I would change is to keep the themes section. I think if we collapse the theme section by default, we will get many discussion posts from people on how to customize the themes. Further, maybe we can use the π icon before show examples. I do this in the rest of the documentation since many people are unaware of the collapsable markdown option introduced somewhere last year, and π draws their attention. Nevertheless, I already attached the hacktoberfest-accepted
label so take your time. ππ»
Codecov Report
Base: 96.79% // Head: 96.79% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%
:warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
12317f3
) compared to base (0efb982
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:exclamation: Current head 12317f3 differs from pull request most recent head 7d612e7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7d612e7 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2242 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.79% 96.79% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 3836 3835 -1
Branches 328 328
==========================================
- Hits 3713 3712 -1
Misses 121 121
Partials 2 2
Impacted Files | Coverage Ξ | |
---|---|---|
src/cards/stats-card.js | 100.00% <0.00%> (ΓΈ) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@anuraghazra I think this is a significant improvement of the documentation. π Can we please merge this?
Amazing restructure @mezzode! Thanks for the PR.
Although now I wonder what will happen to the translated docs π TBH I find them hard to maintain and doesn't add much value to the overall project other than welcoming new people to contribute to the translation docs.
Amazing restructure @mezzode! Thanks for the PR.
Although now I wonder what will happen to the translated docs π TBH I find them hard to maintain and doesn't add much value to the overall project other than welcoming new people to contribute to the translation docs.
I gave up on the non-card-related translations a long time ago since I got overwhelmed by maintaining them π (I'm not a polyglot). I was still hoping to put the card translations into Crowdin and write a small github action that uses the Google translation API to translate the README using the Google translate APIπ(see https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats/issues/2053). Maybe there are already existing solutions that do this, or Crowdin got updated to be able to do this automatically. π€