Modify field Trial flow chart to replace CNTT with Anuket

[steelescotr]

docs\gov\chapter 9 Modifies the Field Trial graphic to replace CNTT with Anuket

[gkunz]

Hi @steelescotr. Thanks! I noticed that new new png file does not have a transparent background, but a black one. I suggest exporting it again with a transparent background.

Also, I think we should absolutely upload the "editable sources" of the figures. Do you have those available, too?

Finally, I don't think we need a copy of the old file. Git will keep a copy for us.

[steelescotr]

I have updated the Background color on field_trials.png, deleted the .old file, and created new .png files for nfvi_transition and vnf_cnf_tranistion. I added the pptx files under artefacts.

[gkunz]

Hi @steelescotr. Thanks for the update. The background is now white instead of transparent, but that has been the case for the other two figures as well. I don't mind a white background, so that's ok for me.

[steelescotr]

@CsatariGergely Lease review requested change and approve if you are satisfied with the it.

[steelescotr]

@walterkozlowski Can you please add your review to this PR?

[steelescotr]

Thanks for the recommendations Georg.....I will update the graphic, and remove the old file..... As for the editable source, yes I do have that...it's a pptx file. Will add it to the figures directory.

Scot

805-825-1100

From: Georg Kunz @.> Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 12:07 AM To: cntt-n/CNTT @.> Cc: Scot Steele @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [cntt-n/CNTT] Modify field Trial flow chart to replace CNTT with Anuket (PR #3137)

Hi @steelescotrhttps://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsteelescotr&data=05%7C01%7Cscotsteele%40microsoft.com%7C4a5032d2f1e24e6f122608da8be88406%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637976128016528714%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kmOQG%2FZgwquh%2BM8npZXkHxM3Aw1GWGgm0rligHbG0k8%3D&reserved=0. Thanks! I noticed that new new png file does not have a transparent background, but a black one. I suggest exporting it again with a transparent background.

Also, I think we should absolutely upload the "editable sources" of the figures. Do you have those available, too?

Finally, I don't think we need a copy of the old file. Git will keep a copy for us.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcntt-n%2FCNTT%2Fpull%2F3137%23issuecomment-1233838143&data=05%7C01%7Cscotsteele%40microsoft.com%7C4a5032d2f1e24e6f122608da8be88406%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637976128016528714%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=p6w2fYnFj00oLs71IVwVDCEMw06%2B3Ko3dVnvL9ZzPP4%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAXFPFCN7KGBMCLKYGMWGRFLV4BIX5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQBWLS6M&data=05%7C01%7Cscotsteele%40microsoft.com%7C4a5032d2f1e24e6f122608da8be88406%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637976128016528714%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oTVwbkMdG%2F5Y9f47V62eDpr6i4Ev7478PO13W21HkRY%3D&reserved=0. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.@.>>

[steelescotr]

Modifications made to the Chapter 4 - included all of the workload tests defined in RA2. Chapter 5 updated with references to resources.

[steelescotr]

@CsatariGergely @walterkozlowski, I have addressed the requested changes. please let me know if there are other issues to resolve.

[steelescotr]

@rgstori , @CsatariGergely , @walterkozlowski - Could one of you Merge this this PR? it has your approvals already.

[collivier]

The main RC2 contributor is missing in the review. And there are many RST issues in it.

I'm very surprised that this patch has not been brought to TSC yet @CsatariGergely. I think all patchset must be treated fairly. Thank you in advance to apply the same RA1 and RM treatment everywhere.

[CsatariGergely]

Can you share what rst isses you found in here? I fixed what I could found here: #3289 . Are there any others need fix?

I treat the consumability of Anuket as a priority item as without a decent landing page and documentation, misleading repo names and readthedocs url-s we can not expect adoption of the project. All of these topics need changes in the "no mans land" not covered in sub-project meetings or projects. This is the reason why I put them to the TSC meeting agenda. If you think other pr-s should be discussed also in TSC, the agenda is open.