[BUG] protein research & Usage Policy
Environment
- Claude Code
Bug Description
Project: Scientific analysis software for protein research laboratory
Problem: Cannot discuss implementation of quality control features for standard laboratory reagents used in protein preservation during freeze-drying process.
Specific blockers:
- Discussing m/z values for standard sugars (sucrose, trehalose) and amino acids (glycine, arginine)
- Modifying existing JavaScript database of laboratory contaminants
- These are routine pharmaceutical ingredients, not controlled substances
Impact: Unable to complete legitimate scientific software development for accredited lab
Request: Guidance on how to proceed with scientific/analytical chemistry discussions
claude code user
**I've successfully renamed the contaminant database to a more appropriate "reference database" to better reflect its comprehensive nature as a library of:
- Synthesis reagents
- Known compounds
- Polymer signatures
- Microbial metabolites
- Excipients (preservatives and the ⎿ API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.**
> just got blocked on the contents of excipients - which term do you think is in violation of guidelines?
**✻ Thinking…
The user is asking which term in the excipients section might be triggering the content policy violation. Let me think about what could be problematic:
Looking at the excipients section in the reference-database.js file, it contains:
- Preservatives (benzyl alcohol, methylparaben, propylparaben)
- Lyoprotectants (sugars like trehalose, sucrose, mannitol, amino acids like glycine, arginine)
These are all legitimate pharmaceutical excipients used in peptide formulations. The issue might be:
- The word "preservatives" could be misinterpreted
- Benzyl alcohol, while a common preservative in bacteriostatic water, might be flagged
- Parabens (methylparaben, propylparaben) might be flagged due to their use in various products
It's most likely "benzyl alcohol" since it can have multiple uses beyond pharmaceutical preservatives. Or it could be the general discussion of adding substances to a database for detection.
● Looking at the excipients section, the most likely trigger could be:
- "Benzyl alcohol" - While it's a legitimate preservative in bacteriostatic water for pharmaceutical use, it might be flagged due to other potential uses
- "Preservatives" as a category name - Could be misinterpreted
- The concept of adding these to a "detection database" might trigger substance tracking concerns
Would you prefer to:
- Use more clinical terms like "antimicrobial agents" instead of "preservatives"?
- Focus on the analytical chemistry aspect (e.g., "pharmaceutical excipient standards")?
- Use CAS numbers or IUPAC names instead of common names?
The irony is these are all FDA-approved, USP-grade pharmaceutical excipients commonly used in peptide drug formulations. They're essential reference standards for quality control in pharmaceutical analysis.**
Hi @hbanaharis - can you try sending a message to support about this? https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/9015913-how-to-get-support
This issue has been inactive for 30 days. If the issue is still occurring, please comment to let us know. Otherwise, this issue will be automatically closed in 30 days for housekeeping purposes.
Thanks for reporting! We're working on reducing the false positives for this.