[MODEL] Claude overwrites explicit user requirements with assumptions during documentation
Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have searched existing issues for similar behavior reports
- [x] This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)
Type of Behavior Issue
Claude ignored my instructions or configuration
What You Asked Claude to Do
Document technology decisions for a project after discussing them. Specifically, I stated Square was my primary payment processor (the service I personally use) and my first priority. Claude understood and suggested adding Stripe as a secondary option. I agreed to Square + Stripe for v1.0, with PayPal for v1.1.
What Claude Actually Did
Created documentation stating "Stripe (primary) + PayPal (secondary)" - completely omitting Square despite it being my explicitly stated #1 requirement that Claude actively participated in discussing and refining.
Expected Behavior
Documentation should reflect the actual decisions discussed, not assumptions based on "industry standards." When a user explicitly states a requirement and Claude participates in refining it, the recorded output should match what was agreed upon.
Files Affected
Permission Mode
Accept Edits was ON (auto-accepting changes)
Can You Reproduce This?
Haven't tried to reproduce
Steps to Reproduce
No response
Claude Model
Opus
Relevant Conversation
Impact
High - Significant unwanted changes
Claude Code Version
Claude Code CLI (Windows) 2.0.53
Platform
Anthropic API
Additional Context
No response