Leo Lahti
Leo Lahti
I agree with all suggestions here.
Even that could be confused with phylogenetic tree.. how about `getHierarchy()` or `mapRanksToTree()` or `makeTreeFromRanks()`? If the tree itself is formally similar to phylogenetic trees, do we need a separate...
Seems good to me.
If MOFA authors would welcome adding support for MAE this way then that would probably be the ideal solution.
I will bump them again. This is a pity as the approved the idea originally, before the PR.
Thanks @Insaynoah if you have a chance to check it
Yes. Just one reservation: imo we could allow users to choose which altexps they would like to include. The default could be all (as in apply.altexp=TRUE) but it could also...
Hups, yes.
We can close when the PR is merged?