[FEEL FREE TO FINISH] New module: proxysql_cluster

[akimrx]

SUMMARY

IF ANYONE WANTS TO FINISH IT BECAUSE OF https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.proxysql/pull/26#discussion_r672211213, FEEL FREE TO DO IT!

Added new module proxysql_cluster, which implements server management in the ProxySQL cluster. Read more here.

ISSUE TYPE

• New Module Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

proxysql_cluster

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The linked module proxysql_manage_config has also been updated.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.06918% with 46 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.12%. Comparing base (beb3841) to head (6dc9442). Report is 75 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
plugins/modules/proxysql_cluster.py	71.06%	34 Missing and 12 partials :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #27      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.02%   70.12%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files           8       10       +2     
  Lines         994     1329     +335     
  Branches      164      220      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits          696      932     +236     
- Misses        222      295      +73     
- Partials       76      102      +26     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Andersson007]

@akimrx thanks for the new module! Could you please revert renaming of the ignore.txt

[akimrx]

Hi! Yep, a little later

[Andersson007]

If a specialist reviews, tests, and provides feedback that the c.proxysql users will get what they expect, we could merge the module

@markuman if you could take a look, it would be really great

[Andersson007]

FYI: Whoever finishes this, i believe it would be fair if they put themselves in the authors: list

[markuman]

If a specialist reviews, tests, and provides feedback that the c.proxysql users will get what they expect, we could merge the module

@markuman if you could take a look, it would be really great

I can take over. But I'd like to address #60, #61 and #62 first and release 1.2.0
So this will land in 1.3.0 if no one else will do it before :)

[Andersson007]

If a specialist reviews, tests, and provides feedback that the c.proxysql users will get what they expect, we could merge the module @markuman if you could take a look, it would be really great

I can take over. But I'd like to address #60, #61 and #62 first and release 1.2.0 So this will land in 1.3.0 if no one else will do it before :)

sounds very good to me

[markuman]

If a specialist reviews, tests, and provides feedback that the c.proxysql users will get what they expect, we could merge the module @markuman if you could take a look, it would be really great

I can take over. But I'd like to address #60, #61 and #62 first and release 1.2.0 So this will land in 1.3.0 if no one else will do it before :)

I will target #19 for the next release.
the benefits of using proxysql in cluster mode are - imo - marginal. Most of the benefits are already targeted by using an orchestration tool like ansible.
If someone has some time to complete this, feel free to adopt this pr.