test/e2e: mainnet phases test
Describe your changes
Checklist before merging
- [ ] If this PR has some consensus breaking changes, I added the corresponding
breaking::labels- This will require 2 reviewers to approve the changes
- [ ] If this PR requires changes to the docs or specs, a corresponding PR is opened in the
namada-docsrepo- Relevant PR if applies:
- [ ] If this PR affects services such as
namada-indexerornamada-masp-indexer, a corresponding PR is opened in that repo- Relevant PR if applies:
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 74.58%. Comparing base (
cc531ec) to head (90a6493). Report is 16 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4013 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.58% 74.58% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 341 341
Lines 107484 107484
==========================================
- Hits 80167 80165 -2
- Misses 27317 27319 +2
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
In general, I think we should be testing lots of actions in each phase to make sure what does and doesn't work as intended. For example, I wrote on the Namada forum some recommendations for users to test during Phase 3 and 4 of the dry-run:
- https://forum.namada.net/t/dry-run-phase-3-gov-proposal/1085/2?u=brentstone
- https://forum.namada.net/t/dry-run-phase-4-gov-proposal/1086/2?u=brentstone
Hey @tzemanovic, what's the status here of this?
Hey @tzemanovic, what's the status here of this?
I'm still trying to iron out some flakiness - sometimes it passes but sometimes there are pending packets left in hermes for a long time and it times out