Michael Vogel

I know that Lemmy transmit activities, since we process them upon receiving. But the other systems are always announcing the content object and not the activities. I'm unsure if all...

I now did a test - but the post was also rejected (I tested with and without the context): ``` { "@context": [ "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "https://w3id.org/security/v1", { "vcard": "http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#", "dfrn": "http://purl.org/macgirvin/dfrn/1.0/",...

@informapirata with the changes that I applied, that first message will work. But the problem is that currently users on other Lemmy servers won't get your post, since there is...

We can always create a new issue, sure. I'm currently slightly unsure, if there is still any issue.

I have to check what is working and what not. But currently I don't have got the time for that.

@informapirata you are using 2023.05. There had been changes in the current develop/release candidate.

Question is how to separate between services that provide all components of the at protocol and the ones (like currently Friendica) who only allows to use an already existing account...

I will read that issue later (when I have got more time). The most important reason why I would like to define that the audience cannot be changed on non...

In my eyes it has something to do with privacy. The thread starter defined the audience, so this should be respected.

There are many things that cannot be prevented, but could be discouraged. There will be side effects of changing the audience of single posts in a thread: For example it...