Antonio Nuno Monteiro

we should consider using ocamlformat and checking whether we can pass it AST + comments. would likely require changing our comments data structure, too.

```reason great##runAllTests #= ( () => { test1(); test2(); } ); ``` still not great

plugins were removed in https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/2276 so this is no longer a viable strategy

This proposal feels odd to me. It just doesn't make the code clear IMO and to my knowledge no other language does this. At the risk of sounding arrogant, if...

I don't have any alternative suggestions to offer but I still think this will create more problems than it solves. Early return is possible in e.g. JS because you don't...

#1944 should fix this when I get around to incorporating the suggested changes.

@mrandri19 It's not a stupid suggestion at all. We discussed backticks, however the conclusion was that we may want to save that particular syntax for actual string interpolation in the...

Here's the explanation: ```rust fn1(~foo=1, ())->fn2(~bar=2) /* this translates to: */ fn2(1)(~bar=2) /* however, because `~bar` is optional, `fn2(1)` already produced a value. Therefore: */ 2(~bar=2) ``` Although confusing (even...

Right – I'm not denying it's confusing. Just the interaction of 2 constructs that are potentially slightly harder to grasp (fast pipe and optional labelled arguments).

I don't think this is true since Nix relies pretty heavily on PKG_CONFIG_PATH. EDIT: looking at the code there does seem to be some special handling of PKG_CONFIG_PATH when `brew`...