bridge-in-tech-backend
bridge-in-tech-backend copied to clipboard
anitab-org
Research: Add members to an Organization
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, an organization has only one person i.e the creator/owner. An organization may have multiple programs and then they might need to add few members with roles like admin/members.
Describe the solution you'd like Give ideas on how to Add members to an organization.
Give proper gist with models , API structure for sending request/ deleting/ cancelling/ rejecting advantages and disadvantages for your approach.
Hello there!👋 Welcome to the project!💖
Thank you and congrats🎉for opening your very first issue in this project. AnitaB.org is an inclusive community, committed to creating a safe and positive environment.🌸 Please adhere to our Code of Conduct.🙌 You may submit a PR if you like! If you want to report a bug🐞 please follow our Issue Template. Also make sure you include steps to reproduce it and be patient while we get back to you.😄
Feel free to join us on AnitaB.org Open Source Zulip Community.💖 We have different streams for each active repository for discussions.✨ Hope you have a great time there!😄
![welcome[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/4141?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@decon-harsh , this feature was actually considered during BIT GSoC development. However, since this will increase complexity of the development in terms of entities relationship and managerial/admin tasks, we opted to limit only one member can manage an organization at a time. This (one member as organization representative) will be the feature that we will offer in the MVP (1st version) of the application. When we get to the evaluation on the application (users usability testing), we will see if the feature need to be extended to allowing multiple members of an organization to be its representatives. I'll put this as 'Outreach/Research' and 'On Hold' so that we can get back to this when we're ready. What do you think?
@mtreacy002 Thanks for addressing this I get it.
But I really think , this is really a necessary feature & in future BIT will have to extend .
I really wanted to solve this issue . Can we do one thing. Create a seperate branch so that interested people can work on it. Or this could be a GSOC proposal?
🤔. If admins agree, I can put it as one of GSoC project ideas. @isabelcosta , can you please share your opinion on this?
@decon-harsh , I've discussed with @isabelcosta and we'll put this issue as one of GSoC project ideas. Thanks for raising it 😉. Will label it "Status on Hold" for now and will revisit on GSoC.
@sahil9001 , sure, I've added this feature as one of BIT project ideas. Anyone who's interested in applying to GSoC can add this task as part of the tasks in their GSoC proposal and explain how they're going to approach this issue. Good luck with your GSoC application 😉.
